Latest Headlines on OCRegister.com
[x] Close
OC Business News ~ All the latest news that matters to Orange County investors, consumers and businesses.

Archive for the 'Freedom Communications' Category

Freedom, creditors reach bankruptcy deal

January 21st, 2010, 10:58 am by Dena Bunis, Washington Bureau Chief

CLARIFICATION: The Los Angeles Times now delivers the Orange County Register. The newspaper carriers who filed a class action suit against the Register used to work for the company as contract employees. They no longer work for the Register. The blog post below implied that some carriers still worked for the newspaper.

freedom-monument-sign-cropped-small1

WILMINGTON – A federal bankruptcy court judge  today approved a deal between Freedom Communications,  its  unsecured creditors and its lenders that could allow the owner of The Orange County Register to emerge from bankruptcy by  the end of March.

The arduously negotiated deal provides for about eight times more money for the company’s unsecured creditors – including a group of longtime current and former employees – than the company had originally proposed.

“This is a great day – for our employees, for our customers,’’ said  Chief Financial Officer Mark McEachen, who was at the hearing where federal Bankruptcy Court Judge Brendan Shannon approved the Irvine-based company’s disclosure statement and set March 9 as the date for confirmation of the company’s bankruptcy plan.

Under the new plan,  Freedom’s secured debt would be reduced from $770 million to $325 million.

Company officials will now send out ballots to Freedom’s creditors and if they approve the plan, it will go before Shannon on March 9.  The lenders, who will take over the company, will name a new board to take over when the company emerges from bankruptcy. The names of the new board members are expected to be released sometime before March 9.

Today’s agreement, reached after what Freedom’s lawyer Robert Klyman called the most intense negotiations he’s ever had, includes several pots of money that will be set aside for those with unqualified pensions, for trade creditors and for a disputed $29.5 million claim stemming from a class-action suit by the Register’s newspaper carriers.

The company originally offered all the unsecured creditors a total of $5 million. Under the revised plan filed today, that number has swelled to an estimated $32.2 million.

The group left out in the cold under this deal is the current owners, including members of the founding Hoiles family and two private equity firms. Under the original plan, they would have gotten a 2 percent share of the company once it emerged from bankruptcy and the option to buy up to 10 percent more. Now they will get nothing.

McEachen said management will still be able to get a 10 percent share in the new company.

About 100 highly-paid current and former Freedom employees, whose unqualified pensions were terminated by the bankruptcy, will have their pensions reinstated at a 70 percent level.

Robert Feinstein, lawyer for the unsecured creditors, estimated that will net the pensioners about $12.2 million.

“We’re thrilled with the plan, ’’ said Feinstein, who participated in the hearing by phone. “This was as intense an arms length negotiation as one could imagine.’’

Alan Bell, a former Freedom chief executive and spokesman for the unsecured creditors committee called it a fair outcome that balanced all the interests.

“Anyone would like to get 100 cents on the dollar,” said Bell. “The test is whether all the parties are a little displeased. Everyone had to throw something into the pot that they all will grouse about, so I guess that makes it fair.”

In addition to the pension settlement, $14.5 million will be put into a litigation trust that will be used to settle any general unsecured claims and allow the plaintiffs in the newspaper carrier lawsuit to attempt to recoup some of their settlement.

“I’m really pleased on behalf of the class (carriers) we represent — it means a lot to them,” said Dan Callahan, the attorney who represented the carriers in the class action suit.

He estimated the $14.5 million litigation trust would give the carriers $1,000 to $4,000 each. If the trust sues and collects from the board’s insurance companies, he projected it would mean $5,000 to $12,000 per carrier.

Richard Marshack, a bankruptcy attorney with Marshack Hays LLP in Irvine, who has no involvement in the case, said the litigation trust is commonly employed in bankruptcies and is a good vehicle for unsecured creditors to get at least some payment on their claims.  He called the Freedom deal “very reasonable.”

“The structure is excellent — there certainly should be money there to pay the unsecured creditors a reasonable amount and potentially a much bigger dividend,” Marshack said.

Selected trade creditors will be paid in full out of $5.5 million being set aside for that purpose.

Freedom filed for  bankruptcy on Sept. 1. The unsecured creditors had denounced Freedom’s original plan as unfair and illegal, noting that under bankruptcy’s absolute priority rule; existing owners typically get nothing until the creditors are paid off. In addition, they said the take-it-or-leave-it offer “terrorized” the unsecured creditors into giving up their rights.

They asked the Delaware judge to reject the reorganization plan, an action that would have delayed Freedom’s efforts to exit bankruptcy quickly.

Asked why Freedom was willing to add so much more money into the deal, Klyman said it was a matter of what was best for the company, both in terms of the ability of executives to run the operation and for it to emerge as soon as possible from bankruptcy.

“It’s all about getting to a deal,’’ said Klyman, who wouldn’t say why the board was willing to agree to forgo the equity share in the company the original plan provided for.

Bankruptcy, Klyman said, is a “distraction for management,’’ and the company has to “operate in a fishbowl’’ while it’s still under the court supervision.

” It’s great news for the company, its employees, its retirees, its community and its business partners,” said Burl Osborne, Freedom’s acting chief executive. “We all have to be grateful to the shareholders who put the interest of the company ahead of their own interest.”

What is still uncertain is exactly how much money the newspaper carriers who sued the Register will end up with.

The dispute between the newspaper carriers and the Register dates back to 2003 when about 5,000 current and former delivery people claimed they were supervised as if they were employees but paid as independent contractors who got no benefits. The company contended the carriers signed contracts saying that they were independent contractors.

Last year the two sides agreed to a $28.9 million settlement but Freedom says the bankruptcy filing voided it.

Their share of the new Freedom plan’s $14.5 million litigation trust will provide them with some money and the agreement gives the trust the ability to sue former and current directors of the company and Osborne to try and recover more money for unsecured creditors.

Freedom officials estimate that the insurance policies held by the company directors and Osborne have a combined value of $25 million.

In addition to the Register, Freedom owns 32 daily newspapers nationwide and more than 70 weekly newspapers, magazines and other specialty publications. The company also owns eight television stations.
Freedom is just one of seven media companies that have gotten caught in the grips of the recession exacerbated by a major challenge from the Internet. Tribune Co., owner of the Los Angeles Times, filed for bankruptcy in December 2008. That case is still pending.

(Register staff writer Mary Ann Milbourn contributed to this report)

Did you miss these other recent media stories …

Share this post:
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • NewsVine
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis

Freedom bankruptcy proceeding delayed

December 17th, 2009, 3:15 pm by Dena Bunis, Washington Bureau Chief

freedom-monument-sign-cropped-smallWILMINGTON, DEL. A federal judge this afternoon delayed until January a hearing on whether Freedom Communications can put its proposed bankruptcy reorganization plan to a vote of  its creditors.

Robert Klyman, the lawyer for Freedom, parent of  the Orange County Register, told Judge Brendan Shannon that after an afternoon of discussions between the company, its banks, the unsecured creditors committee and other interested parties, that the company agreed to a delay until January.

“We’re hoping we’ll be able to report to you a resolution,”   Klyman said.

Read the rest of this entry »

Share this post:
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • NewsVine
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis

U.S. Trustee, creditors attack Freedom bankruptcy plan

December 15th, 2009, 4:07 pm by Mary Ann Milbourn

A U.S. bankruptcy trustee and two unsecured creditors groups have asked a Delaware judge to throw out Freedom Communications Inc.’s proposed bankruptcy reorganization plan because they say it is unfair, illegal, was done in bad faith, and “terrorizes” the unsecured creditors into giving up their rights.

Irvine-based Freedom, in amended papers filed late Monday, contends the reorganization plan is legal and fair.  It argues the plan at least offers some compensation to the unsecured creditors who would otherwise get nothing because the company owes its lenders so much money.

freedom-monument-sign-cropped-smallThe arguments were filed in advance of a pivotal hearing on Thursday in which a bankruptcy judge will rule whether Freedom, parent of the Orange County Register, will be allowed to move forward and put its proposed reorganization plan to a vote of the creditors.

Under the proposed plan, Freedom’s lenders, who are owed $772 million, would cut the debt to $325 million in return for a 98 percent ownership stake in the company.  Current shareholders, including the founding Hoiles family and two private equity firms, would get a 2 percent interest and the opportunity to buy up to 10 percent more. General unsecured creditors would share $5 million, an amount the creditors called “a pittance.”

The company says it owes the unsecured creditors $24 million to $53 million.  The lower figure excludes a group of newspaper carriers, who claim they are owed a separate $29 million as part of a class action lawsuit settlement. The company argues that agreement was voided by its Sept.1 bankruptcy filing. The carriers are now demanding $102.7 million based on claims in their original lawsuit.

If they approve the plan, Freedom estimates the unsecured creditors would recover 9 percent to 21 percent of what they are owed under the $5 million offered for their claims.

The unsecured creditors have been sparring with the company since shortly after it voluntarily filed bankruptcy on Sept. 1 under a prearranged agreement with its lenders.

“The plan proposed by the debtors in collusion with the existing lenders represents an attempted abuse of the Chapter 11 process,” said the unsecured creditors in their formal objection.

The unsecured creditors took particular exception to the current shareholders getting a stake in the new company.  Under the so-called absolute priority rule, existing shareholders typically don’t get anything until the other creditors are paid.

Particularly galling, according to the unsecured creditors, is that they must approve the plan, including the existing shareholders’ new stake, or they get nothing.

Roberta A.  DeAngelis, the U.S. Trustee, weighed in on the side of the unsecured creditors.

“This proposal is prima facie not fair and equitable,” she wrote.  “It acts to terrorize creditors from exercising their rights because if they do they will get nothing.”

The trustee and the unsecured creditors also object to a condition that requires the creditors to give up their right to go after Freedom’s current and former officers and board members for additional money.

In addition, they argue that the plan discriminates between the general unsecured creditors and the unsecured trade creditors.  The plan allows trade creditors that will continue to do business with the company after the bankruptcy to be paid from a separate $5.5 million escrow fund.

In sum, they contend the plan, as proposed, is so flawed that it cannot be officially confirmed by the court, so the judge should reject it.

Freedom argues its proposed plan is fair and involves significant concessions by the lenders, who will still not recover all they are owed.  The company describes it as a consensual agreement in which the lenders are willing to give the unsecured creditors $5 million as long as the creditors agree they won’t seek any other money.

The amended reorganization plan says it will leave it up to the bankruptcy judge to determine if the conditions the company set up for the distributions violate the law.  Freedom warned that if the court decides the conditions violate the law, the current shareholders and unsecured creditors would end up with nothing.

“(They) should assume when considering objecting to the plan they will not receive any distributions and govern themselves accordingly,” said the Freedom filing.

As for the unsecured trade creditors, Freedom said they should be allowed to vote as unsecured creditors because they do have claims against the company.  After the bankruptcy is over, they will be paid from excess cash, not monies that are part of the bankruptcy.

In a separate filing JPMorgan Chase, the agent for the banks, said the unsecured creditors committee’s objection tries to recast the efforts of the company and the banks to reach a settlement “into an act of moral turpitude.”

“The settlement is a business deal among various stakeholders in the chapter 11 process, each with its own interests and bargaining leverage, just as Congress intended in enacting the Bankruptcy Code,” said the lender.

The bank argued that all the issues the creditors and trustee raised should be part of the arguments at the confirmation hearing scheduled for February and not Thursday’s hearing on the proposed disclosure statement and reorganization plan.

Marc Winthrop, a Newport Beach bankruptcy attorney who is not involved in the Freedom case, said that while the trustee’s strong objection added weight to the unsecured creditors’ objections, rejection of disclosure statements and reorganization plans is “pretty rare.”

However, if the judge determines that the plan can’t be officially confirmed, he may send it back to be reworked rather than spend the time and money putting it to a vote, only to reject it at the confirmation hearing.

Read the  Unsecured creditors committee objection HERE.

Read the newspaper carriers’ objection HERE.

Read the U.S. Trustee’s objection HERE.

Read Freedom’s overall response to objections HERE or the point by point response HERE.

Read Freedom amended bankruptcy disclosure statement HERE.

Earlier stories on the Register and Freedom Communications ..

Share this post:
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • NewsVine
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis

Creditors for Register owners may look for buyer

December 2nd, 2009, 6:20 pm by Dena Bunis, Washington Bureau Chief

WILMINGTON A federal judge today gave the unsecured creditors of Freedom Communications Inc. permission to see if they can find a buyer and make a better deal for the Irvine-based company than the bankruptcy plan currently on the table.

freedom-monument-sign-cropped-lrg

Judge Brendan Shannon granted the committee’s request to find an alternative to the pre-agreed plan between Freedom and its bankers, a deal that the unsecured creditors say amounts to a sale of the company to the lenders. Freedom is the parent of the Orange County Register.

Shannon said he believed the committee should be “afforded the opportunity to test the marketplace.”  But, he said, “my ruling here should not be taken as an implicit suggestion that a different or better result is out there.”

Shannon also made it clear that this decision would not slow up the bankruptcy proceeding and should not be viewed as his having formed an opinion on whether the company’s plan is viable.

A hearing on Freedom’s disclosure statement, which describes the financial details of its reorganization plan, is set for Dec. 17.
Shannon set aside three days in February for a confirmation hearing on the company’s plan, which is necessary before Freedom can exit bankruptcy.  The unsecured creditors have until Freedom’s reorganization plan is confirmed to come up with a buyer for the whole company.

Craig Barbarosh, a bankruptcy attorney with Pillsbury Winthrop’s Orange County office who is not involved in the Freedom case, called the ruling a significant result for the unsecured creditors because it at least gives them a chance to see if they can recover more money from the company.

“Basically the judge is saying, ‘If you think you can get more value here, show me, but until you get that, I’m going to go ahead (with the case),’” Barbarosh said.

Freedom filed for bankruptcy on Sept. 1. Under its plan, the lenders, led by JPMorgan Chase, agreed to cut the company’s debt from $770 million to $325 in return for a 98 percent interest in the company. Existing shareholders, including members of the Hoiles family and two private equity firms, would be given a 2 percent share plus the chance to buy up to 10 percent of the company.

The unsecured creditors are being offered $5 million. They are owed at least $24 million and perhaps as much as $53 million.

“This plan is riddled with massive conflicts of interest,’’ said Robert Feinstein, lawyer for the unsecured creditors committee.

The only way for the unsecured creditors to even get the $5 million he said, is if they agree to giving the Hoiles and the private equity firms the 2 percent stake.  They would ordinarily get nothing under bankruptcy rules.

That $5 million “is a gift,’’ Freedom lawyer Robert Klyman said after the hearing. The banks could have insisted that they get everything, given that they are secured creditors who still won’t be made whole under this plan.

After the hearing, Freedom Interim CEO Burl Osborne called the judge’s ruling “disappointing.’’ He said it would distract management from managing the day-to-day business and the bankruptcy.

Osborne and Chief Financial Officer Mark McEachen both testified that granting this motion would injure employee morale and could make advertisers uneasy about doing business with Freedom properties.

Feinstein wouldn’t speculate on whether the creditors committee’s financial advisor, the Trenwith Group, will find someone who wants to acquire Freedom.

“This has never been market-tested so who knows?” Feinstein said. “There is some real value in this company, and they (Freedom) should be talking it up and not talking it down.’’

Register staff writer Mary Ann Milbourn contributed to this report.

Earlier stories on the Register and Freedom Communications ..

Share this post:
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • NewsVine
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis

Creditors turn up the heat in Freedom bankruptcy

November 30th, 2009, 6:14 pm by Mary Ann Milbourn

Unsecured creditors of Irvine-based Freedom Communications Inc. are attacking the company on two fronts in bankruptcy court in hopes of recovering up to $53 million they say they are owed.

freedom-monument-sign-cropped-lrg1Freedom, parent of The Orange County Register, contends it only owes unsecured creditors $24 million. A group of newspaper carriers claim they are owed a separate $29 million as part of a lawsuit settlement. The company argues that agreement was voided by its Sept.1 bankruptcy filing.

The company is offering the unsecured creditors $5 million total while giving the banks a 98 percent interest in the company.  In return, the banks agreed to cut Freedom’s debt from $770 million to $325 million.  Existing shareholders, including members of the founding Hoiles family and two private equity firms, would be given a 2 percent stake in the company plus the chance to buy up to 10 percent.

The unsecured creditors think they should get more and have asked a Delaware bankruptcy judge to appoint the Trenwith Group, an investment bank, to solicit offers for the company.

In a motion to be heard Wednesday, the unsecured creditors argue that Freedom agreed in its prepackaged bankruptcy deal with its bankers not to shop the company. The unsecured creditors in their court filing called the deal “tainted with self interest” and said that if the company won’t seek out a better plan, the unsecured creditors should be allowed to.

Freedom said shopping the company would be a waste of time and effort.  Mark McEachen, Freedom’s chief financial officer, said in testimony that the company has received unsolicited offers from “bottom feeders” but no one has offered enough to pay off the bankers or even to cover the $400 million to $500 million estimated current value of the company.  As of Nov. 24, the company said its debt was trading for 41 cents on the dollar.

In a separate motion, attorneys representing about 5,000 newspaper carriers asked the bankruptcy judge to appoint an examiner to investigate how the bankruptcy deal was set up and who would benefit from it.

“The company believes this is another attempt to slow down the restructuring and intends to file a response by the Dec. 10 deadline,” said Maya Pogoda, a Freedom spokeswoman.

The carriers specifically questioned a 2004 recapitalization plan in which the privately-held company agreed to buy out disgruntled members of the Hoiles family for $900 million.  The deal, the carriers argue in their motion, left the company $900 million in debt “and might well have rendered them insolvent.”

In addition, the carriers’ filing cited “tens of millions” of dollars paid out to shareholders after the buyout. They also pointed to $160 million in payments and additional liens given to Freedom lenders as part a loan waiver approved last April and $3 million in fees given to JPMorgan, the lenders’ agent, on the eve of the bankruptcy filing.

The carriers are angry because they sued The Orange County Register for back wages claiming they improperly had been classified as independent contractors and therefore were deprived of the benefits and compensation of employees.

A settlement was approved in June in which the Register agreed to set aside $29 million for the carriers, to be paid Sept. 14.  Freedom, however, filed bankruptcy Sept. 1.  The company claimed the bankruptcy filing voided the carriers’ settlement and the company took the money back from the escrow.

The carriers contend the Register never intended to pay the settlement and specifically timed its bankruptcy filing to avoid making the payment.

Richard Marschak, a bankruptcy attorney at Marshak Hays LLP in Irvine, said the judge may be open to the creditors committee motion asking to solicit bids for the company because it potentially could get more money back than in the company’s plan.

Approval of the motion for an examiner, however, is a long shot, said Jonathan Lipson, a bankruptcy law professor at Temple University.

He studied 576 major bankruptcies between 1991 and 2007.  Of those, examiners were requested in 87 cases and only 42 were appointed.

Lipson said in many cases a motion for an examiner is a strategic move used as leverage by an unsecured creditor to get more money out of the bankruptcy.  Judges tend to be reluctant to grant the motions for that very reason, he said.

Read the unsecured creditors committee motion to hire an investment bank to solicit bids for the company HERE.

Read Freedom’s objection to the motion to solicit bids HERE.

Read the newspaper carriers’ motion to appoint an examiner HERE.

Earlier stories on the Register and Freedom Communications ..

Share this post:
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • NewsVine
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis

Freedom execs defend bankruptcy plan

November 19th, 2009, 5:40 pm by Mary Ann Milbourn

(Update Nov. 20 - The East Valley Tribune in Mesa, Ariz. reports a buyer has emerged for the paper, which Freedom had said it would close by the end of the year.)

Two executives from Irvine-based Freedom Communications Inc. today defended the company’s bankruptcy reorganization plan — which has been criticized by a former chief executive as “wicked and immoral”  — and said they expect to complete the process by June 2010.

freedom-monument-sign-cropped-lrg1“We are making progress with the effort to restructure the company through the Chapter 11 filing,” said Freedom Chief Executive Burl Osborne during a conference call with a group of Freedom reporters.  It was the first time officials at Freedom, parent of the Orange County Register, have discussed the reorganization plan since the company filed for bankruptcy Sept. 1.

Freedom filed voluntary bankruptcy after working out a prepackaged deal with its lenders. Under the plan, the banks would get  a 98 percent stake in the company in return for reducing the company’s debt from $770 million to $325 million.  Existing shareholders — members of the founding Hoiles family and two private equity firms— would get a 2 percent interest in the restructured company and the opportunity to buy 10 percent more.

The unsecured creditors committee, however, called the plan the product of  “an unholy alliance” between the banks and the current board of directors. The creditors claim they are being offered just $5 million of the $300 million they are owed.

Freedom Chief Financial Officer Mark McEachen said the plan is fair because the shareholders will get no stake if the unsecured creditors do not approve the reorganization plan.

“Everyone’s interests are aligned,” he said.

In addition, he said the $300 million figure had been misunderstood.  He said it represented total liabilities but that “less than $25 million” is owed to the unsecured creditors. (That does not include a separate $28.9 million legal settlement with Register newspaper carriers. The company contends the bankruptcy filing voided the settlement.)

“That number, that ratio of $5 million to less than $25 million is a lot better recovery than in usual recoveries,” McEachen said.

Rob Feinstein, attorney for the unsecured creditors committee, said he took the $300 million figure from the company’s bankruptcy filing.

“If the numbers work out better than that, great,” he said.

Feinstein, however, said it was unfair to give the unsecured creditors less then they are owed and then make any payment contingent on the existing shareholders retaining a stake in the company.

“Creditors are impaired all the time, but you don’t impair the creditors and give more to the shareholders,” he said.

Among the unsecured creditors are about 100 highly-compensated current and former executives and their survivors who are owed about $17 million in pension money. The company cut off those pension payments as part of the bankruptcy.

Osborne said he was sympathetic to those who lost their pensions but that such plans often are voided in bankruptcy proceedings.

“It’s not that someone at Freedom did not like this program and wanted to get rid of it,” Osborne said.

Former Chief Executive Alan Bell, who is leading an effort to recover the pension money, accused the company of needless cruelty. He said these people worked hard, believing that they would be paid pensions.

McEachen said Freedom is not currently shopping the company and has declined several offers by what he called “bottom feeders.”

The Freedom-owned East Valley Tribune in Mesa, Ariz. reported Friday that an unnamed buyer had emerged for the newspaper.  Freedom had announced the paper would be closed by Dec. 31.  Osborne and McEachen said the buyer came in with a last-minute offer that would save a “large number” of the jobs at the Mesa paper.  They said Freedom will ask the bankruptcy court to approve the sale.

The unsecured creditors committee has asked the bankruptcy court in Delaware for permission to seek buyers or to offer alternative proposals for the company.

Earlier stories on the Register and Freedom Communications ..

Share this post:
  • email
  • Facebook
  • Google Bookmarks
  • NewsVine
  • Technorati
  • TwitThis